|
��չ���� |
|
| ������Ϣ | |
 |
Supporting info |
|
PDF(188KB) |
|
[HTMLȫ��] |
|
�����[PDF] |
|
����� |
| �����뷴�� | |
|
�������ù����� |
|
���� |
|
Email Alert |
| ���Ĺؼ���������� | |
|
���� |
|
�ɶԱȽ� |
|
ͬʱ�������� |
| ��������������� | |
|
�Ժ��� |
| PubMed | |
|
Article by |
���ǵĹ��̶��������ľ�ֵ����Ҫ��Ӧ�ü�ֵ,
�������о�����������ҩ��Ч�õ�Ӱ��. ����������������(��:
Hayter\ucite{4}�еļ���), ���ŵ����ڲ����˸��̵������Ƚϵ�������,
�Ӷ��ܹ��ṩ������ᷢ���ں�ҩ�������в�ͬ��Ч��.
����Ϊ�����ֵ�����Լ���, �����Ʊ���Զ������������.
���ĵ�Ŀ�������һ��������ھ�������Lee and
Spurrier\ucite{8}������ŵ��ͬʱ����������Ʊ���.
making successive comparisons between ordered treatments. Their
procedure has important applications for problems where the
treatments can be assumed to satisfy a simple ordering, such as for
a sequence of increasing dose-levels of a drug. The advantage of
their procedure is that it provides more chance to detect when
changes in the treatment means occur than other test procedures (for
example: test in Hayter\ucite{4}). The disadvantage of their
procedure is that it is not as powerful as other test procedures. In
this paper we propose a test procedure which try to keep the
advantage of Lee and Spurrier's procedure and promote the power
performance of their test procedure.